Wednesday, September 13, 2023

China and Chinese – Need to give the less discerning world better perceptions

A friend forwarded me a video clip showing a long line of Chinese being arraigned (rounded up?) to be deported to China. Such a scene did not come as a surprise to me. However, the flag that is placed next to China’s aroused my curiosity. There is no country that has that flag. I was therefore skeptical of the clip’s genuineness. I asked if it was made for a movie. Another friend in the chat group said the flag belonged to a separatist state in Myanmar. Apparently, 1,200 Chinese criminals have been netted and they are being deported to China.

Chinese criminals operate with a great degree of lawlessness in Southeast Asia. Those based in Myanmar and Cambodia are particularly evil and wicked, luring unsuspected job-hungry people, especially those of Chinese descent, with promises of high pay, to travel to Myanmar, Thailand and Cambodia, but only to find themselves being sold like cattle to partake in scams, gambling solicitations, sex trade, drug smuggling, organ sales, etc. Ransoms are demanded from their loved ones at home, and notwithstanding the fact the money had been remitted, many never returned, with some had their organs harvested and left to die and be thrown like rubbish in dark corners.

The Chinese government has been doing its utmost to hunt down these criminals. Many had been sent back to face the music like this one. Most of these in the pictures are mules called piglets in the trade Their arrest is a god-send opportunity for them to have their lives back, albeit after a jail time in China. But the kingpins run their operations from elsewhere, and live a life that is opulent by any standard. (Aren't those recently caught in Singapore also snakeheads? See how luxurious their condos and houses are, and the types of cars they show off. But many seemed oblivious to the consequences that they would face if they are caught. Why is this so?

I have used the term Chineseness often in my blog. The latest being my use of it to describe Huawei’s resilience and its ability to come up with that Mate 60 Pro smartphone phenomenon. A well-intentioned friend thought the word was not quite appropriate and suggested that I use “the spirit of the Chinese” to describe the many traits that Chinese generally possess when they face challenges and suppression. I replied to say that while that is part of my intention, my concept of the term really goes beyond the hallmarks but also the negative aspects of Chinese behaviours, many of which were actually reflected through our Confucian upbringing. A case in point is the unnecessary self-effacing tendency by Chinese in public appearances. And while innate entrepreneurship seems to be another positive aspect of the community, it is often driven by extreme greed, like the way some of these people in the video have been transformed into ‘snakeheads’.

(a)  Power of Greed

I always contend that, which many Chinese will disagree, we are culturally influenced by competing philosophies, each has its own logic. Kung-tze and his equally sagely disciples preached transparency and good deeds. On the other hand, Sun-tze’s military doctrine emphasizes deceptions as a tactical measure to win battles, without even having to fight one. Chinese minds are therefore in many ways shaped in that mixed-bag of head-and-soul determinations – Ren Zhengfei, Robert Kuok, and their likes on one side of the entrepreneurial divide, and Jho Low and the snakeheads on the other.  

(b)  Subtle Patronage

Even though China does not quite admit it, their concept of world order is still premised very much on the need for them to play a big brother role to the lesser countries in the region. This certainly appears too patronising to many.

The Nine-Dash Line is already difficult for its neighbours to accept, yet a new map which has just been released by China shows a new maritime boundary: A Ten-Dash Line! I do not believe China means it to say that the whole South China Sea is theirs. It might mean a defence line which China would not allow the US and its allies to breach, and their defence actions begin from there. If this indeed is the case, then they should have explained it when it was published. Call it China’s Maritime Defence Line, and who would quarrel with you?

China’s PR is weak, even though they have a team of highly regarded MoF spokespersons. Their CGTN is too mickey-mousy to the world to tune in. They have to learn from the West how world opinions are shaped. You need to speak to the world in English, which is an unfortunate but real-world fact. I am sure that readers are aware that there are many Taiwan scholars and thinkers who speak highly of China’s leadership and their achievements. And they are very pro-unification. One even lamented that he wished what they have said could be translated into English for the Americans and their allies to understand. It is a fact that DPP commands only about a third of the support from Taiwanese, but because the other political forces there are so fragmented, the trophy of the next presidential election is likely to end up on William Lai’s lap.

If only the Taiwanese can come to realisation that it is important for them to call themselves ‘Chinese’, then the unnecessary threat from the US and its allies would evaporate immediately. The world will go about doing their usual business thereafter.

(c)   Unabashed Flouting of Wealth

Many Chinese have made good and become fabulously rich. Despite their wealth, many live modestly. However, some with their wealth are anxious to show that they now belong to a different world. In public places, some behave as if they own the world – loud and obnoxious. You can have your Bentley or Ferrari, but you also need to be law-abiding. Some treat the roads as if they were built for them – indiscriminate parking, etc. Of course, fellow Chinese will just label you as show-offs, but in societies where there are other races, behaviours like this attract racial stereotyping – Chinese are exploiting us!

 

(d)  Blind to Good Etiquette

Strangers, even of the same kind, usually appear invisible to Chinese. Few bothers to greet fellow park users. In public places, like food courts and transport terminals, there is a tendency to deprive others of space even if you do not need it. And personal hygiene is thrown into the air, especially in toilets. All these make others think that we Chinese are ugly and uncouth.

 

One can write books on this. With its rise, it is time for China and Chinese to give the world better perceptions of the country and themselves.


Thursday, September 7, 2023

August 29th, 2023 - The Breakthrough Day

By now, folks would have read or heard about Huawei’s release of its 60 MatePro smartphone in China. The date was August 29th, 2023. It was done without fanfare, but at a time when US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo was visiting the country. Huawei’s miseries began 1,566 days ago. As we all know, two of Biden’s Cabinet members – Trade Representative Katherine Tai and Raimondo – were responsible for much of China’s economic woes today. Much to China’s disappointment, Katherine continued where Trump had left off. However, on this trade war front, China has not been too greatly disadvantaged, despite Tai’s hawkishness.

But on the Commerce front, Raimondo is most vicious. (I have written earlier that she had developed a hatred for China after her father lost his job when his employer Bulova watch decided to relocate to China.) She and her deputy who was seconded from CIA executed Biden’s policy of retarding China with a degree of zeal that only someone quite irrational would do. Huawei was only one of the victims; there are hundreds more in China. The entire Chinese high-tech industry was put into jeopardy. Many estimated that the US actions might have set China back technologically by a decade, thanks to its inability to produce high-end chips.

It was indeed a bitter pill for China to swallow. The country was already completely capable or designing the most advanced chips, albeit on US software; Huawei was about to become world’s No 1 smartphone maker. China was putting too much faith in globalisation and manufacturers like Huawei was happy to farm out the production to chip foundries, local or foreign, as long as they could use them to produce their devices competitively to penetrate the world markets. And these foundries depended largely on ASML of Holland for their DUV and EUV lithography machine needs. The tyrant came in and choked China on two fronts: the deprivation of EDA software and all advanced chip-making equipment to China, including those from its allies.

It is therefore most ironical that while Huawei has been the acknowledged world leader in 5G technology, it has not been able to come up with a 5G smartphone for the last four years. And at last!

Huawei has not claimed that its Mate60Pro is 5G phone, neither has it said that the Kirin 9000S chip used is 7 or 5 nm, save to say that it is anchored on its own HarmonyOS platform. But soon users found that its speed well exceeded standard 5G’s. On top of that it could make satellite calls, thanks to its tie-up with China’s BeiDou Satellite Navigation System!

Not surprisingly, the Huawei feat was not given much weightage by the Western and pro-West media, where some went on to speculate that the chips must have been sourced through dubious means. Yes, Huawei has the expertise, but it does not have the software nor the foundries to produce such high-spec chips. So the argument went. Maybe the Arabs are helping them to procure?

But on taking the set apart, they found it is 100% China-made! This simply means that Huawei has overcome the two biggest hurdles: the software and the foundry to do 7nm- or 5nm-equivalent chips!

I am no expert on smartphones. But from the comments made by the more authoritative sources, they are facts.

Any firm in Huawei’s shoes would have yielded under the type of pressure applied by the US government – Toshiba of Japan and Alstrom of France are the classic examples of US tyranny. Huawei’s founder Ren Zhengfei is made of different stuff. He perseveres and Huawei has emerged even more formidable. Ren personifies the best of Chineseness. But Huawei’s breakthrough epitomises a much wider strength of the nation – Chinese preparedness to 吃苦 (chī kǔ) or bear hardship and if push comes to shove, to pull everyone together to fight for a national cause. The phone is selling like hot cakes now. Many buy out of patriotism (and the anger with America’s sanctions). Apple would also be releasing their iPhone 15 soon. The possible impact is not lost on them.

This begs the question Biden and his team have to answer: Does the trade war and all the sanctions they are imposing on China work to achieving their mission of retarding China?

The answer is obviously no. But you can bet that they will even be more vicious in their actions regardless.

Upon her return, Raimondo said the US policy to deny China access to advanced chips would be sustained with more vigour, yet she wanted China to buy their low-end chips. What sort of logic? Jake Sullivan, the National Security Adviser, has also just promised that the administration will tear down the device to find out if any of the bit or piece has breached America’s sanctions.

Chinese are natural tinkerers, and with a huge domestic market, any product innovation will soon spin to all sorts of derivatives. Given the size of China’s population and its middle class, they can easily achieve the critical mass, and the competition is so intense that the lesser ones will soon fade and the good ones go on to become champions in the world. BYD is a case in point. To deny China of any technology will simply make them work triply hard to overcome, and the results are usually beyond the West’s imagination. Failure is just a temporary set-back. The significance of this idiom 卧薪尝胆 (wò xīn cháng dǎn, lying low to fight another day, constantly being reminded of past bitterness) is a cultural trait that is absent with the Westerners.

Chinese are capable of ‘commoditizing’ anything they lay their hands on. Of course, this also means that they will not be able to position themselves in the ranks of BMW, Gucci, Rolex, and what-have-you. But Rome is not built overnight. China has indeed come a long way in just thirty years or so. Give them another ten years, it is not unlikely that they can make it. They know all the MBA stuff, for sure.

America is frantically building the chip-making factories to produce all the high-tech chips. But high-tech chips only account for a small percentage of the world needs. Even in military applications, 14nm will suffice, not to mention chips that are used in motor vehicles and white goods. And China is entirely capable of making these grades at the moment. Who would buy from America then? Without sales revenues, how can they survive commercially, let alone the ability to fund R&D, which is so essential in high-tech industries.

It boils down to the fact that America is led by people who are good in winning elections (like Trump and Biden) or who have obtained pedigree degrees, especially in law (like Blinken or Raimondo) or who ironically are Black or Coloured (like Harris and Austin). Few of these people really understand business and technology.

First Blinken, then Kerry, then Yellen, then Raimondo, every of them wished and had visited China, not on invitation but by asking, but China and the US have not come any closer on trade and technology issues. (Austin has yet to be ‘granted’ the pleasure, but with his ‘sweet potato’ head, will he be able to make any difference on the military front? I doubt.) It is obvious to me that they are not interested to live with China as equals. They just want to size up China and come up with more shackles.

Xi Jinping is not attending the G20 summit in New Delhi. I doubt he will attend the APEC do in California too. With the world so fractured, these meetings are a waste of time, except for Biden, who wants every opportunity to rein in more allies or hoodlums to contain China. On the other hand, BRICS has found new purposes and has accepted new members. But its ability to succeed is still far from certain, for India remains a ‘joker’ in this pact.

Yes, China is facing some serious economic headwinds now principally in real estate debts and export declines and upon her return, Raimondo has been chàng shuā’ing (唱衰 – singing songs that are tuned to belittle an adversary) China’s economy. (IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva, who has also just made a visit to Chia, offers a different take. Her outlook for the country is positive and encouraging. Who do you want to believe? Someone with an axe to grind or someone who has a global responsibility to shoulder?) We all know following all the decoupling and derisking measures taken by the US and its allies and supporters, China is now suffering on many fronts, besides those in high-tech. Many factories have moved out of China. The jury is still out on this; however, this also represents an impetus for China to climb up the value ladder. Fed’s aggressive interest rate rise policy has caused most currencies in the world to depreciate; China’s is not spared.

Nonetheless, China is also plagued by a certain wild west, Ponzi, gung-ho culture amongst its many unscrupulous up-and-coming entrepreneurs. They are giving China a bad name. Xi has done much to weed this out; but greed is always an irrational motivating force.

Be that as it may, this is a phase that China has to go through. It will eventually prevail.

Biden and his team should sit down to do serious soul-searching. Imagining that China is trying to replace them as the hegemon of the world is their Archille’s heel. China wants its citizens to have a tomorrow that is better than today. If America does not send its war ships and planes to East and South China Seas, China will know how to share the seas with its neighbours and prosper together. Given the state America is in at the moment (dilapidated infrastructure, homelessness, drug abuse, gun violence, debt, and lawlessness-amongst-youth culture), they should set to bring their own house in order, instead of making China the bogeyman to win elections.

If all the sanctions and all the alliances (NATO, AUKUS, the Five Eyes, etc) can be removed or dismantled, China will be able to help bring to the world abundant affordable gadgets to make living more pleasurable and affordable. The US can continue to offer Harvard, Yale, MIT, Princeton, etc to the world, and the rest of the world will always be able to find niches in their economy and resources that would allow them to prosper comfortably – if there are no US to sanction or sabotage them.

That will remain a dream, as long as you have leaders like Biden!

Friday, August 4, 2023

My New Book - Knowing Your Roots


Author: LIM Yu-Book

This book is a ‘sequel’ to his earlier book “China’s Arduous Journey to Earn its Place” for which printed and digital copies were extended free to whoever had requested for it. One can still obtain the digital copy from:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yVFu9KhFlP2XsqI5gQMIf2kcwD3TLEc3/view?usp=sharing

This w book is not meant for people who are already knowledgeable on the subjects written, rather, it is intended to help younger ethnic Chinese know more about their roots and be proud of China. Two-thirds of the book is about China’s history since Huang-Di, interspersed with teachings, legends, festivals, practices, etc that can be attributed to the dynasty/era covered, and the rest about what China has achieved over the last couple of decades and the attempt by the US and pro-West forces to retard China. (Many Chinese are still holding highly prejudiced views about the Chinese government and their very own culture – thanks to the might of their media – which the author wants to help correct.) He does not mean to be chauvinistic, but being a widely read and travelled individual, he has come to realization that only with a strong China that all Chinese can walk tall in this Western-centric world! Nonetheless, he wants to say this to readers: Feel free to disagree!

There is a social cause, and as such, all proceeds from sales/sponsorships less layout design and printing costs will go to funding free physical copies for our young.

1. Offer to Friends:

M$45/copy

2. Delivery:

Klang Valley - ​Est M$15 (up to 3 copies)

Own Pickup​ (Guard House, The View @ Serai Saujana, Jalan U2/48, Saujana Resort)

3. Free Copies for School/College/Community Libraries:

A certain Mr Oei who lives in Singapore is donating 500 copies of the book to reach our young. I welcome school/college/community libraries to apply. Up to 3 copies will be supplied to each genuine request.

4. To order:

Email the author at yubooklim@gmail.com, or whatsapp him at +6011-269-80499 for details.

         (The book is also available on Gerakbudaya, Lazada and Shopee platforms and in some bookshops.)

 

The  Author


Monday, July 24, 2023

Killing the Goose that Lays Golden Eggs

I am mean when I talk about personalities for whom I hold in great contempt: people like Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Antony Blinken, Llyod Austin, Katherine Tai, Nicholas Burns and last but not least Gina Raimondo. The entire echelon of Biden’s team!

Harris, Raimondo, and Tai belong to the fairer sex but do they justify the connotation of the term 'fairer sex'? Certainly not to me! And do they have good brains? 

I should leave them to readers to judge since we have seen these two characters in action often. But we often hear that Harris is quite dumb and has long been sidelined to play an inconsequential role in the White House. As for the other two, Tai wants to show her peers that she is more anti-China than them. We have many such Chinese around.

And last but not least: Raimondo…

I love to hate Raimondo’s physiognomy; she looks so witchy! (How unkind of me! She had no say in the matter at all, right? But I always believe one's face will be slowly shaped by his or true true character. An evil person will carry a kind of sinister look; a con-man will also wear a certain fake note on his face. Cannot run, lah!)

I have written about Raimondo’s background before – born 1971 of Italian descent, earlier career as a lawyer venture capitalist, later governor of Rhode Island from 2015 to 2021, and became Biden’s commerce secretary when the latter become the US president. There is no doubt that she was academically a high achiever. She did her undergraduate Arts at Harvard College and qualified with a JD degree from Yale in 1998. She also won a Rhode scholarship to Oxford where she received her PhD in Sociology in 2002. Apparently, her father spent his entire his career at the Bulova watch factory and when the company decamped operations to China, he lost his job at 56. This might explain her hatred for China.

Great academic credentials do not mean she has got a good brain.

We all heard that several of the big American IT companies are making representations to the Commerce Department to remove the restrictions placed on the export of their wares to China. What shocks Jeffrey Sachs – in an interview on the subject I recently watched on video – is the department’s close-to-zero understanding of the ABC of business, i.e., to make money. The strength or competitiveness of these American firms lies basically in their ability to stay ahead in technology. To stay ahead, you need to spend money on R&D. And the money must come from profits. Where can you make great profits? China of course! No country can replace China in terms of appetite!

And Chinese are hell of an innovative people. With America’s wares, they make products that consumers all over the world want and can afford to pay. Remove this basic linkage, everybody cries!

Lesson 101 in International Economics, Period. Yet, according to Sachs, this ABC is something they do not seem to understand.

I do not believe these bureaucrats do not understand such basics. I contend that they have a boss who simply hates China, and she wants to outdo everyone in their zeal to make China pay. Of course, this Lesson 101 is too much of a fuss for Sleepy Joe to care.

Yet, she is waiting for her invitation to go to China. She thinks she can outsmart China. 

Let’s see.

 

 

Sunday, July 23, 2023

China’s Philosophy on Matters of Friendship

 


 

  

 



Many cynical Westerners had this to say about the extraordinary reception received by Henry Kissinger during his recent visit to China: Why is China lavishing on a has-been? Remember, former Filipino president Duterte has also just visited China. He was also warmly received. To these people, China is playing the wrong tune, geopolitically speaking.

Chinese concept of friendship has always been anchored on 感情 (gǎn qíng) – a term that encompasses several heartfelt expressions (to good deed by someone in the past, a genuine concern or offer of help, or the trust and confidence placed by a friend) and the earnest desire to reciprocate or return the favour when one is able to do so. You often see Chinese sparing no effort and expenses when it comes to entertaining good friends or someone who has done them a favour. Chinese diplomacy is simply an extension of that philosophy.

When Kissinger first visited China, Xi Jinping was still a nobody. But Kissinger’s place in China’s collective heart and mind has long been etched. Every Chinese is grateful that he has helped paved the way for China to join the world, even though we all know Nixon at that time was no saint; he also had a motive in wanting China to open up. Whether China’s re-emergence to what it is today is an intended consequence of that decision is still being debated by many lesser thinkers in America today. And whether this centenarian was coming to China on his own, or supported by the Biden administration, or being sponsored by some more-thoughtful parties in the US or elsewhere is not important to Chinese. Regardless, Kissinger is one whom they will always lay out the reddest of red carpets. He was being received like a head-of-state by Xi, who hosted a luncheon the arrangement for which China was happy to share with the world. He could even get to see Defence Minister Li Sangfu, who has refused to meet the 大番薯 (fān shǔ, big sweet (more appropriately, ugly?) potato) Llyod Austin. Biden and Blinken must be grinding their teeth! (It is therefore unlikely that Kissinger’s visit was sanctioned by the US government.)

I suppose it is hard for the West to understand our Chinese psyche. The West’s diplomacy is premised more on a transactional or Machiavellian nature – tit for tat, might-talks, zero-sum, etc, and usually devoid of compassion or long-term considerations. American bureaucrats and military officers will always behave as if they are superior to their counterparts. (Remember Blinken’s stupid opening remark to Yang Jiachi and Wang Yi during their first meeting in Alaska? And remember how America has reneged on those undertakings and promises made to China after World War II?) But they love underdogs – the way the Japanese showed subserviency to the Americans after their World War II defeat. And they are suckers to know how to manipulate them – like Saint Modi. (They also know how to squeeze the balls of beholden leaders in Europe and one particular one in Asia called Marcos Jr and many White worshippers like Yoon and Kishida.

Paul Keating is one rare Australian politician who truly understand the geopolitics in Asia. But he gets belittled each time he opens his mouth. Most Westerners have short memories; all they love are things that give them immediate gratification!)

Maybe good for the rest of the world to understand why Chinese can sustain themselves as a continuous civilisation for millennia! A couple of hundred years is just a flash in the pan in history.

 

Thursday, July 20, 2023

The 'Disappearance' of Qin Gang

For all my admiration of the CPC (to me, it reads the Confucian Party of China) and the Chinese government for their deliveries to the Chinese people, I still do not think highly of their international PR competency. The latest is the sudden disappearance of Qin Gang, the country’s Foreign Minister. When the world has begun to show empathy on China’s stances vis-à-vis those of the United States in most geopolitical issues, its complete silence on Qin Gang’s whereabouts reinforces China doubters of their conviction that the country lacks transparency. To them and many others, China is still very much a Stalinist state.  

Qin Gang’s rise has been most phenomenal. Born in 1966, he entered the country’s foreign service in 1992, made an ambassador in 2010 (to the United Kingdom), and became the ministry’s vice minister in 2018. In July 2021, he was named ambassador to the United States. He became the country’s youngest foreign affairs minister in December 2022 and appointed a state councilor in March 2023.

Qin Gang has all the looks and gravitas to go places. Even Western leaders have little on this extraordinary diplomat that they can find fault with. His demeanours are easy to like and advocations, logical and forceful.

He has not been seen since June 25 when he met officials from Sri Lanka, Vietnam, and Russia – a


century in China’s political and diplomatic calendar!

There is literally nothing from China’s official PR apparatuses on his disappearance, save for a brief allusion to his health. COVID-19 was thought to be the cause; but it obviously cannot be, since he would have long recovered if he had indeed been infected with the disease.

Rumours are rife, especially from the Taiwan media. The most cited is the ‘fatal attraction’ that occurred in March last year, when Phoenix TV’s presenter Fu Xiaotian (傅晓) flew to interview Qin Gang. The pretty Cambridge-educated presenter is one of the most prominent figures on Chinese television. She has recently appeared with an infant son. Who is the father, many have asked.

 

But affairs do not usually kill one’s career outright in China. In 2021, news surfaced that Zhang Gaoli (张高丽), a member of the central committee of the CPC’s Politburo, had also a fling with tennis player Peng Shuai (彭帅). Zhang has not been disgraced.


There is certainly more to it in Qin Gang’s case.

 

Taiwan commentators love conspiracy theories. A couple of other happenings in the recent weeks are to them ‘hot connections’. 


Feng Yanghe is renowned for designing China's first artificial intelligence "brain" to run military operations. The fatal accident happened at about 2:30am on 1 July in Beijing. He was only 38. Feng had made important breakthroughs in the use of AI to support military command and control operations. Was it just a traffic accident? Many have asked.

The second is the ‘mysterious’ death of Wu Guohua, the deputy commander of the PLA Rocket Force, on 6 June. And in late June, his senior and commander, Lieutenant General Li Yuchao, was found missing in a promotion ceremony of the Chinese military. The absence sparked speculation that Li might be under investigation. Apparently, America has come to possess all the details of PLA’s Rocket Force and even had an article on them published publicly.

Since all these happened around the same time, it is just natural for all of us to draw connections. A source even claimed that Wei Fenghe, China former defence minister, who also headed the Rocket Force before, is also being investigated for alleged corruption. Ditto the integrity of several key PLA officers Zhang Zhenzhong, Liu Guangbin and Shang Honga who have been associated with the Rocket Force is also being called into question.

Fu Xiaotian, who lives lavishly, is said to be under suspicion as a ‘double agent’. A source says she is aligned to forces that are still loyal to Jiang Zemin.  

The silence does not augur well for China’s image, when Taiwan will soon be holding its next presidential election. (Remember the Hong Kong riots that went on to help Tsai Ing-wen win the election?)

Tuesday, July 4, 2023

Some Inconvenient Truths

Many readers will certainly accuse me of being racist after reading this article of mine. If not because of Joe Biden, I would not have wanted to write it, as the saying goes, you need poison to fight poison. The West’s superiority complex towards China and Chinese are becoming too unbearable for me.

But what I am going to write are simply inconvenient truths, and they are surely politically incorrect to brag about under normal circumstances. Humility should always come first, no matter how endowed one is.  

The following two pictures have been making their rounds in WhatsApp forwards. The backdrop reads: European Girls’ Mathematical Olympiad 2023, Slovenia. You can see from the faces of the winners. Regardless of the country they represent, everyone is ethnically Chinese! I have written about this phenomenon before. But I would like to speak my mind a bit more on this.  



There are 13 or 14 academic Olympiads each year and the most prestigious of which, I understand, is the International Mathematic Olympiad (IMO). I am not sure if this Slovenia event is one of them. But some 60 countries did take part and China emerged as No 1, followed by the US and Australia. The top European prize went to Ukraine.

China has won the IMO championships the greatest number of times, and many of the members of winning teams America and Australia were also ethnically Chinese!  

The cold truth is that each race has its own genetic constitution. Chinese are genetically very adept at Science and Mathematics. As a language, Chinese is most facilitating in counting. We generally use Intelligence Quotient (IQ) to measure braininess. But we also know IQ is also greatly influenced by factors like geography, climate, food, and other resource factors. Below is the map

which shows the average IQ scores of countries. 

 


Japan has been ranked No 1. Taiwan and Singapore followed close behind. I have taken the liberty to discuss them based on the following broad clusters:

1. The East Asians

Japan  106.48, Taiwan, 106.47, Singapore 105.89, Hong Kong, 105.37, China 104.1, South Korea 102.35

2. The Caucasians and the Levante People

Finland 101.2, Germany 100.74, Netherlands 100.74, Canada 99.52, Australia 99.24. Switzerland 99.24, United Kingdom 99.12, United States 97.43, Sweden 97, France 96.69, Russia 96.29, Italy 94.23, Spain 93.9, Cyprus 93.39, Israel 92.43, Malta 91.27, Greece 90.77


3. Southeast Asians

            Myanmar 91.18, Vietnam 89.53, Thailand 88.87, Malaysia 87.58, Philippines 81.64, Indonesia 78.49

4. Arabs

            Iraq 89.28. Bahrain 83.6, United Arab Emirates 82.05. Libya 80.92, Jordan 80.7, Saudi Arabia      76.36, Egypt 76.32

5, Central Asians

            Uzbekistan 89.01, Kazakhstan 88.89, Tajikistan 87.71. Turkey 86.8

6. Latin Americans

            Mexico 87.73, Uruguay 87.59, Cuba 83.9, Brazil 83.38, Venezuela 82.99

7. South Asians

            Sri Lanka 86.62, Pakistan 80, Iran 80.01, India 76.24, Bangladesh 74.33, Nepal 42.99

8. Pacific Islands

            Fiji 83.96, Solomon Islands 83.96, Samoa 83.96, Micronesia 83.96, Papua New Guinea 78.49, Timor-Leste 78.49

9. Africans

            Uganda 76.42, Kenya 75.2      55, Angola 75.1, Tanzania 74.95, Zimbabwe 74.01, Burkina Faso 73.8, South Africa 68.87, Zambia 68.43, Ethiopia 68.42, Nigeria 67.76, Ghana 58.16. 

Darwinian evolution is an on-going process. There are two aspects that govern IQ developments – one is genetic, which takes ages to improve; the other is environmental where the limiting force for its potential growth is largely self-inflicted by the people’s very own society. The first one is too politically impolite for me to cite examples, but I can offer many examples in the second situation. A case in point is Singapore. If it had only grown – economically and socially – like the rest of its Southeast Asian neighbours, then its average IQ today will probably register in the region of 90. It is 106! On the other hand, America and many countries in Europe are likely to see their average IQ regressing in the coming years, since there is so much in-migration from regions where average IQs are pretty low. Average IQs amongst East Asians are likely to plateau around the 105 level for many years to come; however, readings amongst the South and West Asians, particularly the Indians, will noticeably climb further north in due course. The figure for Israel is surprisingly low. I thought it should read 120!

Homo Sapiens reaching China 100,000 years ago…

The following information was extracted from a book called A Pocket History of Human Evolution book published by S. Condemi. Contrary to earlier belief that Homo sapiens left Africa some 60,000 years ago, Condemi argues that the latest research seems to show that the migration reached China more than 100,000 years ago. I thought this is the principal answer to the question I was posing in the first place?

We know the Out-of-Africa timeline has been revised many times. We must leave it to the experts to sort the facts out. Given the capability of modern science, this should not be a tall order.