I was reading "The God Argument" by A C Grayling who is the professor of
Philosophy and master of London's New College of the Humanities. His latest book
consists of two parts: (a) Against Religion and (b) For Humanism. I suppose many
will not share his argument on the former; however, his argument on the latter
touches me greatly. I would like to share the following excerpts with
you...
"Cicero in his De Senectute (On Old Age) held that people should be free to
think for themselves, because they possess rights; but at the same time they
should be conscious that their rights define their responsibilities to others.
Our ethics should be premised, he said, on the fact that all humanity is
brotherhood: 'There is nothing so like anything else as we are to one another,'
he wrote in On Laws; 'the whole foundation of the human community' consists in
the bonds between people, which should reside in 'kindness, generosity, goodness
and justice'. The possession of reason places on individuals a duty to develop
themselves fully, and to treat others with respect and generosity. These ideas
are the essence of humanism today."
"Ideas of a distinctively humanist stamp are however not restricted to the
Western tradition. Equally ancient in their roots, they are central to
Confucianism and the tradition of non-theistic ethical schools of India."
"That the human good is for human responsibility to discern and enact,
without reliance upon, or invocation of, any of the many religions which claim a
transcendental source of authority, and posthumous rewards or punishments for
obeying or failing to obey."
Most of us assume that we are the thinker of our thoughts. If we are really the creator of our thoughts, then we should be able to stop our thoughts at will. Just try to stop thinking for one minute. Is it possible? For those who have meditated, they can confirmed that thoughts arises by itself. The scientist will label it is involuntary response, like our digestion and the beating of our heart.
ReplyDelete