My wife Saw Hwa does not write or read Chinese. But she loves to tour China. We have been to many places in China, but we have yet to cover the Silk Road. She does not quite like to follow tours organised by Malaysian or Singaporean agencies – the tour guides of the former tend to conduct themselves in Cantonese and the latter, in Mandarin; she knows neither. Moreover, they are too good in terms of delivering value for money – tours usually last seven to fourteen days, and they are packed solid with heavy itineraries. But this is dreadful for both of us, most of the spots are jammed packed with local tourists, whose fear of missing out can be very annoying. She decided to sign up with Sydney’s Wendy Wu Tours for this visit. There were 17 of us in the group, four were from the UK, three from New Zealand, 12 from Australia (two of whom were Australian Chinese); we were the only two from Malaysia. Most of us are in our sixties or seventies. Several of them have visited China before.
Although the starting
point is the historic city of Xi-An, which we have been to a few times before,
we still like the city. Things do not stand still in China; you get surprises
in every visit. From Xi-An, we took a HSR to Lan-Zhou, and from Lanzhou we
visited a couple of nearby smaller cities, including the Tibetan city Xia-He,
where the Labrang Monastery is located, Xi-Xia, which is well-known of its
biggest Sleeping Buddha statue, and Jia-Yu Guan, where the western end of the
Great Wall is located. Apparently, President Xi was visiting Lan-Zhou at that
time.
The next stop was Dun-Huang,
which was a must-visit city along the Silk Road. The highlight was of course the
grottoes there. Not too many foreign tourists were visiting at that time; we
were treated like celebrities in a cultural theatre show there.
From Dun-Huang, we took
an HRS to Turpan. From Turpan we went to Korla by coach. The National Highway
was impressive; it traverses awesome mountains and deserts along the way. We celebrated the
mooncake festival in Korla. From Korla we continued to Kuqa and that was where
we first experienced “security” check. We were constantly reminded of the need
to have our passport with us, giving us the impression that security was tight
along the Silk Road. Indeed, the local guide had to file our presence there,
but it is not the type of fearsome procedure that the western press had wanted
us to believe. Indeed, from thereon, each time we entered a small prefecture
city, we had to do the same. But nobody was inconvenienced; as a matter of
fact, some police officers even boarded the coach to welcome our visit.
From Kuqa we went to
Aksu to visit a cave temple, which predates the grottoes in Dunhuang.
We arrived at Kashgar,
the Silk Road’s most western city in China on September 20. We were pretty done
with the Silk Road by then. Before we flew out to Urumqi, we visited the Sunday
market where live cattle were traded in a big way.
Urumqi was essentially a
modern Han Chinese city and the must visit spot is the Heavenly Lake.
From Urumqi, we flew
into Beijing. We did not join some of the tours save for a climb to the Great
Wall again.
Wendy Wu’s local tour leader Gary Guo was superb. My wife and I survived the 28-day journey without any drama!
* * * * *
Although several of our
tourmates have visited China before, I could see that some were still not
convinced that China was far from the Stalinist or totalitarian state they believe
it is still one today. When I asked if one who still held the view since we had
gone into the countryside only to see that people were generally happy and no
poverty or economic or social or religious deprivations were in sight, he said in
a democracy one could “moan” and not get into trouble. Saw Hwa was happy to ask
if he preferred to see people leading a miserable life in many parts of the
“democratic” world, he reluctantly conceded that the Chinese leadership had
indeed done much for its people. Another was more accepting; he agreed that all
the talk about oppression, or suppression, or forced labour, or genocide was a
load of bulls from the western politicians and press.
Yes, Hans, Huis,
Uyghurs, and other Central Asian minorities live harmoniously everywhere. Two
of local tour guides were Uyghur. I asked them privately if they were proud to
be “Chinese” and they responded without hesitancy that they are were. I could
tell the answer was genuine.
Be that as it may,
there is still much China can do to bring their perceptions to a higher plane.
First…
Yes, the Chinese
economy is indeed slowing down. The malls are pretty empty, so are restaurants
which boast huge dining rooms and tables. We know what has contributed to this
situation. The sanctions by the west have caused China’s supply side to scale
back, hence resulting in higher unemployment especially amongst its youth, and
the policy clamp down on real estates has caused many Chinese to hold back
spending on bigger ticket items. But you do not see any sign of desperation.
We all know the four components of GDP are consumption,
investment, government spending, and exports. China is not lacking in the last
two. Thanks to western sanctions, investment does suffer. However, it is the consumption
component that is troubling the Chinese government now. (The exception is perhaps
in the cars you see on Chinese roads – they are generally pretty new; not the
old jalopies we often see in developing countries.)
But let the westerners continue with their cacophemism (a
new word which I have just learned from my friend Tan Jin Hwee – a hard term pinned
on something good to make it look bad). Xi and his team know what is good for
the country. And the Chinese have the resilience to go through hardship and
turn things around.
Although Chinese cities generally are well planned – broad
tree-lined and well lighted boulevards and generous parks and lakes, – even the
modern buildings can be described as “nice from far, but far from nice” in
terms of upkeep. Their glass facades are crying hard to be cleaned. Most of the
shop fronts and apartment blocks are also in dire need of a new coat of paint,
not to mention broken tiles in pavements and ugly patches on sidewalks. China
should introduce an urban redevelopment authority like what Singapore does. People
need to be “forced” to spend to keep their living spaces look clean and orderly.
This will certainly add tremendously to “useful” consumption in GDP at this
time of need! (Chinese are not poor; they certainly can well afford it.)
However, I should not generalise too much. The Hui precincts,
especially their apartment blocks, are remarkably cleaner; even their mosques
have traditional Chinese “temple-like features, like those in Xi-An. (I would
have thought Uyghurs by the virtue of their religion would have a higher
standard of personal hygiene, but this trip tells me that it is a wrong
assumption, maybe the nomadic instinct is still present in their culture.)
Public toilets, despite frequent efforts by cleaners, are generally smelly even though some laybys
boost state-of-the-art features – electronic panels to tell visitors which is occupied,
and which is empty. It is simply a result of poor habits.
These are some of my observations about the hotels provided
by Wendy Wu Tours: they are generally adequate; some even have robotic features
which did appear a little outlandish to me. But fittings and fixtures found in
them, except the two operated by Mercure, still look sloppy in terms of upkeep
and maintenance. And the corridors do not smell fresh. I suppose smoking in the
room is still hugely tolerated, although no-smoking signs are there for all to
see.
Now that China is
opening to the world to allow them to see the true situations in Xinjiang, they
need to “inform”. Chinese hotels only offer CCTV channels. Few know how to tune
in, let alone enjoy their coverages, since instruction is only in Chinese. They
should start to cater to western visitors with objective programmes and
narratives about China. So are the road signages, since they are only in
Chinese and Uyghurs only.
China’s HSRs are an
eye-opener to westerns. The stations are awe-inspiring, and their locomotives
are sleek. The trains are punctual and the ride smooth. Nonetheless, they look
a little tired, though. Many need a good bath. Many users have still not been
conditioned to exercise civic-conscious; littering is still evident, even
though they have cleaners to do the job. The service’s hawkers seem not very
interested in promoting F&B sales, except the ladies who were assigned to sell
locally made cosmetics.
Smoking and spitting in
public places are still noticeable, and this largely irks westerners. This, I
often advocate, is something they need to learn from LKY. Throughout my trips
to China, I have always taken pain to convert unthoughtful Chinese to be more
civic-conscious and this trip is no exception. I believe I have made at least
ten Chinese better citizens by whispering these lines into their ears: 老兄,有外国旅客. 文明旅游,不好随地吐痰 , or 老兄,有外国旅客, 不好在此吸烟 (Dear Friend,
there are foreign visitors, let’s do not spit or smoke in this public place.)
We flew out with great optimism for China. My earlier book - China's Arduous Journey to Earn Its Place, From Mr Q to President Xi Jinping - has not been written in vain after all.
Hahah. Good you both enjoyed your trip. Let me tell you i lived with my grandmother before i go to Kindergarden school in jalan pudu. What toilet we use? Bucket toilets oitside the house.
ReplyDelete1/n:
ReplyDelete1. The Silk Route is part of China's overland BRI to circumvent any naval blockade of her trade and oil routes to/from Europe and the Middle East.
Into Central Asia as geographical pivot, it resonates with MacKinder's continental link between Europe and Asia, and until Meloni fell under the sway of the US, it traced the European Marco Polo route via Italy. Into the SouthChina Sea, it envelopes China's historical claims which also counterbalance US naval forces in Asia's waters. The Silk Route which starts in Xinjiang thus has geostrategic importance to China.
Which was presumably also why the US tried to destabilize China by radicalizing Xinjiang's Uyghurs, as mentioned in:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUKMXeghO2Q
One notes the US had labelled the East Turkestan Independence Movement as terrorists but after China announced her BRI, the US removed ETIM from the list. ETIM was at that time also supported by Nato's Turkey and counted as its members some of the Uyghur officials from the community locally running Xinjiang.
Into the fray was also one Adrian Zenz, an Austrian fringe anti-Communist recruited by the BBC (UK), funded by the Jamestown Foundation (US) and supported by ASPI (Australia) whose deskchair research based on unaudited publicly-available documents and testimonies by Uyghur separatists was used as evidence of China's internment of highly extrapolated numbers running from thousands to over a million Uyghurs in concentration camps.
Zenz had also researched Tibetan independence which the Dalai Lama had later admitted was funded by the US' CIA and supported by Nehru's New Delhi.
Left to said, in outbursts within Xinjiang running to one episode at Kunming's airport, the radicalized Uyghurs had killed many Han brethren before the temporary clampdown, reeducation and economic improvements were made.
These activities were however twisted by the US' Mike Pompeo, an arch-deacon who once led the CIA and came out to admit, 'we lied, we cheated, we stole':
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPt-zXn05ac
In any case, China's 2021 defense on Xinjiang is in:
http://au.china-mission.gov.cn/eng/sghd_1/202104/t20210428_9124977.htm
3/n
ReplyDeleteAfter so many years, the name of the small village in Hefei escapes me. I had visited it after sitting down before a historical personage in Beijing's Diaoyutai. The entire village had waited hours. They gave an enthusiastic dance and musical performance in the hope they could be sponsored to give touring performances overseas.
Since the US administrations of either mien are deadset against China, it is thus left to peoples-to-peoples interactions to mend the rift. Maybe Beijing together with welll-wishers in the US can fund such villagers from all over the country to visit the US and perform again that will revive the cultural elements left by the Confucian Institutes which have been disbarred by the US. Surely, if Americans can take to heart China's pandas, they can take to heart China's villagers of whom there are still millions in need of poverty alleviation, a task which Beijing has not forgotten as she tries to rationalize internal reforms and external development.
The West, especially the US, is still hellbent on containing China. For instance, it says she is overcapacity in her exports of EVs. One asks how can a country be in overcapacity of something she is just manufacturing for the first time? Just like her Huawei with its 5G, the West seems adamant to ignore facts just to outlaw using its own man-cooked regulations China's technological progress whenever the West cannot compete. And it fails to compete because for decades it has neglected to train its own workforce and invest in its own manufacturing lines, for that matter work out its export price factor sans its unionized manufacturing costs. Given the litany of sanctions and tariffs on China whether they be by the Democrats or the Republicans, the US will end up making only for Americans when most are still living paycheck-to-paycheck who can benefit from the lower prices but increasingly higher quality of China's products. In short, the US cacophemism against China is actually a series of balderdash hogwash caco-phonies against China.
The Europeans are not much of a market for US capital goods and may not also for long welcome US investments since these would mean the EU economy comes under MAGA-ish control by US MNCs. Maybe that's why von der Leyen was criticised in one EU parliament session.
China's STEM smarts still want to study in the West, and have done particularly well in the US' top universities. It must be the research facilities as well as the ability of US lecturers to identify the fertile areas of research. Those students and post-graduates contribute a lot which helps the US maintain its 'cutting-edges' in technology development. Yet the US wants to bar them while also by way of sanctions and decoupling cut down China's own domestic progress in the very areas they deploy to tap China's brains.
The US says it wants to collaborate and yet compete. How is this going to pan out? Campbell and Cotton already said the US wants Chinese students to study social sciences and the US federalist papers instead, and not the hard sciences like AI and quantum computing even when they know the US will be the first to benefit from Chinese students on US soil doing research in these areas in much the same way China's EVs on US roads will afford the cheapest and most modern way to make the green transition. One asks has US students studying social sciences and the US constitution in any way helped relieve US income disparity?
4/4:
ReplyDeleteAbove all else, the Chinese everywhere value education, reasoning and financial independence. For instance, they celebrate to every family in even the smallest villages whenever one of their children get admission into a university. In cities they stop the traffic so that students can be ferried on time to take the important gaokao exams. It's a tradition of staying focus on what matters. It's their eon-long supply chain of knowing what serves to uplift and improve oneself.
As Beijing rolls out more reforms to attract manufacturing investments and stimulus packages to revivify consumer demand, the tier-two and three cities will next see the same progress as did the eastern coastal regions of the past four decades. China is one massive country and she has room for more growth to the extent of creating a second, even a third 400-million-strong middle-class.
As she phasally does so, her rural peoples will become more educated and discerning which will in turn drain away any persistent habits of old that came about from historical neglect formed by past denudations by warlords and outright foreign theft of her wealth and treasures leaving only grey neglect and social angst. Maybe the foreigner who wants her peoples to moan more freely is hankering for the return of her painful past on the premise of 'your loss, my gain'? Still?
A strong and progressive China can like Zhenghe's massive fleet lift all boats around her. Japan's new Ishida (not to be confused with Ichiren's pork-bone ramen soup) should realize for Japan's future, better with Chinese butter than US buttress.
And what be that US? What makes America the greatest country in the world? Newsroom 2012:
https://tinyurl.com/yxrvjju9
Lastly the redoubtable Richard Haas of the US Council of Foreign Affairs wrote a piece titled Gang Of Four, naming Russia, China, Iran and North Korea. Maybe if they were less sanctioned, he can write a more discerning piece on the US congress and name it Gang of Three Hundred for their giving a standing ovation to Netanyahu, the same caco-genocidist whose speech later in the UN was only to a skeleton number as most UN representatives walked out on him - just as he was talking that Jerusalem's attacks were so that Israelis could return to their homes. What about the Palestinians since the formation of Israel?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAn incredible journey along the ancient Silk Road in September 2024! 🌄 From historic cities to breathtaking landscapes, this tour promises unforgettable memories and cultural treasures. https://touvarism.com/
ReplyDelete