Tuesday, June 25, 2024

A New Order in Asia Pacific in the Making?

A new order is fast taking shape in East Asia.

On May 17, Putin visited China. It is obvious that they were tired of America and its allies and are determined to dethrone America as the hegemon of the world. Putin also lay flowers at a Harbin monument to fallen Soviet soldiers who had fought for China against the Japanese during the second Sino-Japanese war, when Japan occupied parts of China. The message to Japan cannot be clearer.

On June 19, Putin visited North Korea – first time in 24 years – and signed a mutual defence agreement with Kim Jong Un. Kim has openly pledged to supply munitions to Russia in its war against Ukraine and Russia says it is no longer bound by the UN sanctions and will help to advance its nuclear pursuits.

Immediately after Pyongyang, Putin flew to Vietnam and was lavishly received there. Putin said he wanted to build a "reliable security architecture" in the Asia-Pacific region.

And hot on the heels, Daniel Kritenbrink, the U.S. assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, touched down in Hanoi. He was there to meet with senior Vietnam government officials to “underscore the strong U.S. commitment to implementing the US-Vietnam Comprehensive Strategic Partnership and to working with Vietnam in support of a free and open Indo-Pacific region.”

Kritenbrink’s visit speaks volumes of the impotence of Antony Blinken’s State Department. Blinken knows only how to eat China or Russia’s dust!

 

A couple of days earlier…

On June 17, a highly charged stand-off was played out between the Chinese coast guard and Filipino navy personnel near Ren’ai Reef (Second Thomas Shoal) in South China Sea. A Filipino marine was injured. White House and State Department condemned China’s alleged conduct at the shoal as “escalatory and irresponsible actions.”  However, Lucas Bersamin, the executive secretary of the Philippines (who reports direct to President Ferdinand Marcos Jr) said, “We are not yet ready to consider this as an armed attack.”  The incident was “probably a misunderstanding or accident,” Bersamin said.

Ditto Marcos Jr himself. He appears to be backing down – with tail between legs.

The incident occurred only two days after China’s coast guard began enforcing a new regulation authorizing its personnel to intercept and detain foreign boats and crews suspected of “trespassing” its waters in the South China Sea. Obviously, Marcos Jr was trying to test China’s resolve.

Why this tone?

The Filipinos were counting on American warships to come to their rescue. (US aircraft carrier The Theodore Roosevelt is in the region.) They never came! And lurking not far away were eight mighty Chinese warships!

Fear of losing his late father’s ill-gotten billions in the US and the need to have a bogeyman to drum up support for his second-term ambition, Marcos has reduced himself to be at Biden administration’s beck and call. He should have consulted fellow ASEAN leaders how to walk the China-US tightrope, i.e., bank on China and pay lip service to the US!

China simply does not want American warships to be hanging around the South and East China Seas. (It needs the depths of the South China Sea to operate its submarines.) China is happy to share the marine resources in the disputed islands and waters with the claimants if they agree to work with it. By choosing to shoot his own foot, Marcos Jr is depriving his country of tourist dollars and a huge market for its produce.   

China is changing its response...

Earlier in the month, a Dutch frigate Tromp was chased by two Chinese fighter jets in East China Sea when it claimed to be “enforcing maritime sanctions” on North Korea.

Remember in May last year, a Chinese plane promptly cut across the path of an American RC-135 surveillance aircraft over the South China Sea, forcing the latter to fly through its wake turbulence. China was fed up with America’s long-term and frequent actions of sending ships and planes to conduct close surveillance on China! And in May this year, a Chinese jet fired flares in the path of Australia’s Seahawk helicopter as it flew above the Yellow Sea. Australia said it was doing a UN sanctions surveillance mission! Really?

In November last year, a U.S. guided-missile destroyer and Canadian frigate sailed through the Taiwan Strait. China could only shadow them.

(Incidentally, the Turkish warship Kinaliada is now visiting Japan to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties between the two nations and the 134th anniversary of the tragic legacy of the Ertugrul frigate’s voyage, which became the starting point of Turkish-Japanese friendship and goodwill. Along the way, the ship called on many ports, including Hong Kong. Turkey is a member of NATO. What is Recep Tayyip Erdoğan trying to achieve?)

US leaders are fast losing their credibility, and much cannot be undone. A new order is emerging to counter American hypocrisy. China is serving “no more nonsense” notice to the West and their eunuchs in the region. A Russian warship has just sailed into Cuba, and it carries Russia’s prized hypersonic missiles. And Thailand and Malaysia are applying to join BRICS.

For the Americans, the presidential election in November will be a Hobson’s choice for them: A semi-demented man? Or an unscrupulous peacock?

Hopefully, all these “freedom of navigation” pretensions or excuses will cease after that. 



Saturday, June 22, 2024

An Independent Taiwan – A Boiled Frog Strategy by the US?

We seem to be saying this, but I have not tried it myself. Apparently, if you put a frog in a pot of water and have it boiled above a slow fire, you will see the frog sitting still there all the time – only to be cooked in no time without showing any sign of any discomfort. This metaphor, I believe, is precisely the strategy Uncle Sam is adopting today to help Lai Ching-te realise his Taiwan Independence mission.

And this is also Xi Jin-ping’s dilemma.

There is no doubt that China can militarily retake Taiwan, but the cost will be very high. Many lives would be lost. Once started, China would also be trapped – its assets in the western and many parts of the pro-West world frozen, and its commitments to the Global South curtailed – and it would have to nurse wounds for a long, long time even if it succeeds in bringing Taiwan back to its fold.

The Biden administration knows Xi’s reluctance to use force against Taiwan. In every previous encounter, America had been assuring China that it was sticking to its One-China commitment. But we knew they never meant it.

China can keep protesting and staging military exercises around the island. Lai will not be bothered. In no time, Taiwan becomes by any measure an independent country. A fait accompli.

With a subservient Taiwan, coupled with existing allies Japan and South Korea, the US can go ahead to reassert its hegemony.

All of us know America is bent on retarding China. This is their crusade. They know they cannot compete with China on level playing fields. The only way is to play spoilt-brat – do everything to pull back China or trip it, economically and militarily. They are not going to be bothered by WTO rules, or any sense of natural justice. Xinjiang, Tiananmen Square, Xichang (Tibet), Hong Kong can be stale rice to us, but they will remain America’s ready stock-in-trade each time they have, or want to have, a bone to pick with China. (As a matter of fact, US lawmakers, led by Republican Rep Michael McCaul and including Democratic former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, are now in Dharamshala, India to present a “certificate” – a bill that has been passed by both houses of the Congress demanding China to renounce itself with respect to its sovereignty of Xichang – to “Suck-my-tongue” Dalai Lama. How absurd the American leaders can be now!)

America has been sanctioning China left, right and centre, even at the expense of its own economy and the welfare of its own people. They do not believe their efforts are futile, even though the world is seeing the opposite – in the examples of Huawei, EVs and space exploration. They are not going to relent, until China yields, so they believe. 

On the military front, America knows that they no longer have an upper hand in China’s eastern and southern seas. They also know they themselves cannot fight a hot war with China. Regardless, it will continue to mobilize its hoodlums to threaten China. And Marcos Jr is a godsend. Whereas countries like Australia, Japan, the United Kingdom, Canada, Netherlands, Germany, etc have sent ships to lend support, they understand the score and are unlikely to act rashly. Filipino soldiers are different; irrationality and “playing victims” usually take precedence in their mindsets and actions, like what they are doing around near Ren’ai Jiao (爱礁, Thomas Shoal Second to the western world).

Like in the war in Ukraine, they need a proxy. And there are many countries which are happy to act as proxies for them in the region – Taiwan, Japan, Korea and, last but not least, the Philippines.

It is very difficult to believe that Joe Biden is truly in control of the White House. His incoherence in the recent G7 Summit in Italy speaks volumes of his mental state. Who is making all the decisions in the White House then?

Antony Blinken’s brain is too small for big issues. Moreover, he feels very insecure. He is only capable of ranting the same old lines each time he faces the press. I suspect it is Biden’s national security advisor Jake Sullivan that is calling the shots in the White House now. Sullivan is the “still water runs deep” type. He does not talk much, but I think he manipulates Biden like a puppet. (Their offices are in the same building; this makes his effort simple!)

There are three other attack dogs in the peck: overrated economist Janet Yellen, China-hating Gina Raimondo, and “Qing Hui” Katherine Tai. Defense Secretary Llyod Austin is largely a humpty-dumpty (big sweet potato in our Chinese jargon), which makes him dependent on a team of uniformed hawks, notably Samuel Paparo Jr., the commander of Ind-Pacific Command, who recently promised China “Hellscape” if it tries to retake Taiwan.


How did you earn your four stars?










But America is likely to have a Peacock on the throne...
Joe Biden may have to say goodbye to the Oval Office in January next year. Donald Trump will surely continue America’s anti-China stance; tougher likely. His people are usually more hawkish.

In a recent article, Robert O’Brien Jr., who was Donald Trump’s fourth and final national security advisor, writes that if Trump returns to the White House, he should sever all economic ties with China and consider deploying the entire US Marine Corps to Asia and resume live nuclear weapons testing. This man might be Trump’s choice if the latter gets elected!

Another Mike Pompeo?

Hollow undertakings will not be Trump’s way; instead, this peahen will be very blunt and blatant in doing everything possible to pace the way or facilitate DPP’s independence pursuits, as long as Taiwan is happy to pay the bills.


What should China do?
Taiwan is drifting away not-too-slowly and surely. Xi’s prestige will take a deep plunge if he cannot bring back Taiwan to China’s fold during the next couple of years. It looks like he has no choice to but exercise a “forced” unification move soon. There is a small window.

America will hold their presidential election in November. It looks like Trump is going to win. Trump wants to be treated like an emperor; no one should be above him. He does not quite care about NATO and America’s other allies. Despite his tough talks, he is at the end of the day a less-than-scrupulous businessman and will always be happy to settle for a good bargain. The hoodlums that Biden has built up are also crumbling. Many will be voted out soon. (In much of Europe, Far-Rights are taking over, and even die-hard US-follower and pseudo-White Rishi Sunak is likely to lose UK’s July election.) Chances of their intervening militarily in the Taiwan issue are lower.

January next year might be a good time for China to retake Taiwan – if it thinks that its other options are hopeless. The operation must be fast and overwhelming, and I am pretty sure PLA has already had their plans in place.

I sense that something is already brewing. Lately, Xi has been talking to his top generals often. Also, China has just issued judicial guidelines, effective immediately, on punishments against “Taiwan Independence” separatists. The separatists could face death penalty in severe secession cases. Much has been publicised about this. Is this a signal?

Alternatively…

However, if Xi prefers to exercise restraints and patience, then China must live with the Taiwan dilemma until (a) its economy is large enough for America to eat its humble pie, say, when it is double that of the US’s, and (b) it is undisputedly No 1 in the world in terms of military strength. This will take ten years, maybe? By then, Taiwan may voluntarily opt to come under China’s “one-country, several systems” federation?

In 2023, China exported USD3.38 T of goods to the world and imported USD2.56 T. It alone accounted for about 12.5% of the world trade. The latest available statistics (2022) shows the US accounted for 16.2% of China’s exports. 6.6% of China’s imports was from the US. Both percentages are unlikely to grow much in the wake of US paranoia about China.

Chinese population is 17.8% of the world’s, its share of the world trade is still below this percentage. If the law of averages should hold, then its share should go up to 20% or more, given its people’s productivity. (Of course, much of its production is consumed by its huge population.)

The decoupling desire from the US has already prompted China to shift’s development and world trade priorities. They are being accelerated. But China should always be more mindful of the quality (or political vulnerability) of its “strategic” partners. They can change colour or allegiance with little notice!

My crystal tells me that in five years’ time, America hegemony will be history.





Sunday, June 16, 2024

Thanks to Joe, the World is Breaking Up!

 

Several indicators have emerged over the last couple of months as to how 2025 and beyond will roll out for the world.

Thanks to Joe Biden, the world is certainly splitting solid into two domains – (a) the old system led by the US and its AUKUS die-hards (the UK, Canada, and Australia), allies like Japan, South Korea and Europe’s NATO and pro-NATO countries, and fan club members like the Philippines, Argentina and Jordan, and (b) the emerging core of China and Russia new order. The latter has amongst them comrade states like North Korea, Venezuela, Belarus, and Cuba. For that description, China can also have Pakistan, Cambodia, and Serbia to count on, though vulnerability remains in some. The new order includes the other pariahs in America’s eyes – countries like Iran and Syria – and is also attracting countries in South, Central and West Asia, Africa, South America and the Pacific Islands.

In between there is a basket of other nations, some of which are quite tired of the US, like its hitherto ally Saudi Arabia, Global South states that are led by more rational leaders like Brazil, South Africa, and a host of others trying to balance themselves between the US and China, like most countries in ASEAN. India stands on its own – led by Narendra Modi who unlike any other, only does things to suit its own interest, regardless of geopolitical consequences.

I really doubt it is Biden who is in-charge in America. Judging from the way he wanders around even in tightly orchestrated situations, I dare say he is mentally incapable of knowing himself, let alone making serious decisions. The “Deep State” (i.e., the Zionist-driven Military-Industrial and Media Complex of America) is calling the shots; and Biden is just the convenient puppet.

Biden has helped to cement this China-Russia hating culture in America. No matter who gets elected in the coming November presidential election, this culture will continue.

Three key areas are solidifying this geopolitical divide: (a) the war in Ukraine, (b) the war in Gaza, and (c) the tension in the Taiwan Strait.

Those who have a clear head know what has prompted Russia to invade Ukraine. But thanks to the propaganda machines from the West and many willing ethnically Chinese accomplices, Russia is seen to be the evil wolf. The cold truth is, despite all the sanctions, Russians are whacking the Ukrainians hard. If not for the support of the US and NATO and their allies, Zelensky would have been a piece of dead meat by now. And despite the huge financial and military help from the West and their allies, he can hardly carry on.

On the other hand, Hamas are very good in shooting their own feet. Their abduction of Israelis has given Benjamin Netanyahu the determination to wipe them out of Gaza. Some 40,000 Palestinians, majority of whom are women and children, have been already killed in the conflict. The rest are like ants on a hot plate, moving from place to place, without any hope of settlement. The obvious acts of genocide on the part of Netanyahu’s forces have also turned much of the world against Israel and its patron, the US.

The consequences of the two wars are dire for both the Ukrainians and the Palestinians in Gaza.

I will talk about the tensions in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea later.

First, let me focus on the latest news: The G7 meeting that has just been held in Italy’s city of Fasano.

 

G7: From Benevolence to Robbery…

A bit of background on G7… When the world was reeling from the first oil shock and subsequent financial crisis, the heads of state and government of the six leading industrial countries – the US, West Germany, France, the UK, Italy, and Japan – met in 1975 for the first time to discuss the global economy. They were joined in 1976 by Canada. In the 1980s the G7 extended its interests to embrace foreign and security policy issues; there were conflicts like Iran and Iraq and the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan those days. Russia was invited to the table in 1998, but following its annexation of Crimea, the fraternity decided to exclude Russia in their 2014 meeting.

 

G7 is supposed to be an informal bloc, but thanks to Biden, it is now acting like an alliance to stop China and Russia. Their landmark decision in this 2024 summit: To confiscate Russian assets and use them to support Ukraine.

 

It is crucial to note that the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia Mohammad Bin Salman had declined the invitation to attend this year’s summit. Leaders of Algeria, Argentina, Brazil, Indian, Jordan, Mauritania (representing the African Union), Tunisia, Türkiye, Ukraine, the UAE and the Vatican are also attending.

G7 on Thursday agreed on a plan to give Ukraine $50 billion loan to help it buy weapons and begin to rebuild damaged infrastructure. The upfront money will come from the US, the EU and some G7 countries, though the details on how much each entity contributes is being worked out.

The idea is to use the nearly $300 billion in Russian assets in the West, frozen after Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, as the basis for the loan. The money will be repaid over time with the profits earned from those Russian assets, about two-thirds of which are in Europe. Many of the assets are in bonds that have matured, creating interest of, depending on the interest rate, $3 billion to $4 billion a year. (It is also worth noting that the US House of Representatives had in fact already passed a bill for that purpose in April.)

 

It the seizure is acted upon; it would definitely undermine international financial rule of law. Who would feel safe to put their money in the West’s financial institutions?

And Now Back to Saudi Arabia… 

Saudi Arabia is not renewing its 50-year petrodollar deal with the US

To me, the most important event so far this year is Saudi Arabia’s decision not to renew its 50-year petrodollar deal with the US – a decision made when G7 was meeting in Italy. For obvious reasons, little has been publicized about this decision by the West. Russia has been de-dollarizing its trade, however, its impact and success so far have been at best modest. But the Saudi decision is going to be seismic. It is expected to accelerate the global trend of using currencies other than the US dollar in international trade, or de-dollarisation. It will change the world’s financial order in due course.

 

Originally signed on June 4, 1974, the petrodollar deal effectively help sealed US Dollar’s hegemony in global finance.

 

Not only that, but it is also joining Project mBridge…

Saudi Arabia’s central bank has decided to join the central banks of China, Thailand, Hong Kong, and the UAE in Project mBridge. The project is a cross-border experiment with central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) for international trade. The project was launched in 2021 to assess the viability of CBDCs for instantaneous cross-border trade and other payments using the project’s blockchain, the mBridge Ledger, which is a possible CBDC alternative to SWIFT. Bank of International Settlements (BIS) has also announced that Project mBridge, after three years, has reached the Minimum Viable Product (MVP) stage and is requesting private sector firms to propose new solutions and use cases that help develop the platform and display all its potential. In addition, the mBridge’s six full participants, 27 other official entities, including IMF, the World Bank and the central banks of Norway, South Korea and Türkiye have signed as observers to the project. Major global financial institutions like Goldman Sachs, HSBC, and China’s six biggest state-owned banks, are also working on the project. (Not all of these will sustain their interest – likely due to G7 pressure – though.)

These moves by Saudi Arabia marks the beginning of a major shift in global economic and financial dynamics.

And the New Tariff Walls:

On May 14, the US introduced new tariffs on several Chinese products on the pretext of China’s “overcapacity” and “unfair trade practices” talks. Most significantly, the duty of electric vehicles (EVs) has been raised from 25% to 100%, and batteries, battery components and parts, and critical minerals, from 7.5% to 25%, either immediately or in stages. Others affected are steel and aluminum, semiconductors, solar cells, ship-to-shore cranes and medical products.

(The Rasputin of the US politics Donald Trump had earlier warned his countrymen that if he were to lose the 2024 election, it would be a “bloodbath” for the US auto industry and the country. This news came after Joe Biden’s 100% tariff announcement on Chinese electric vehicles. Both are trying to outdo one another to kill China. But I do not know what Trump really means by his latest war cry. Is he saying Biden is not doing enough?)

Just as the G7 summit was about to take place, the European Commission announced that additional duties of up to 38.1% would be levied on imported Chinese electric vehicles from next month. (BYD 17.4%, Geely 20%, those who cooperated 21%, the rest 38.1%, and probably to placate the US, EU said Tesla may receive an individually calculated duty rate on its China-made EVs when definitive duties are imposed in November.)

Overcapacity is a term that was coined by Janet Yellen to describe China’s super competitiveness. She is insulting man-in-the-street’s intelligence, yet the political leaders in Europe are parroting and crowing it like a new economic buzzword. Anyone who has a rudimentary knowledge of economics knows subsidies, tariffs, etc will not help make one’s products more competitive. It will only create complacency and finally kill them. But Biden is more concerned about vote-hunting, and Ursula von der Leyen wants the US to lobby support for her re-election as EU’s President and she is happy to shoot the feet of fellow German automakers to please Biden.

The 2024 European Parliament Election Results

The voting took place from June 6 to 9. Far-right parties in France, Italy and Germany gained grounds and the liberal and the Green groups lost seats and relevance.

 

Domestic politics was upended in some countries, prompting French President Emmanuel Macron to dissolve its National Assembly and call for a snap election after his party was trounced by Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Rally. Belgium’s Prime Minister Alexander De Croo similarly resigned. Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orbán was also dealt a blow. His party Fidesz suffered its worst European election results to date, ceding ground to its centre-right opponents. His setback is bad news for China.

Von der Leyen’s party held its ground. If she succeeds in her re-election pursuit, she will certainly continue with her “pro-Ukraine, anti-China” policies.

The Greens were squeezed across Europe.

Now, the Hoodlums in North and South China Seas…

All of us know the two hot spots in East Asia: Taiwan and North Korea.

The totally pro-American South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol is opposed to accommodation with his kinsmen in the north. He and the war in Ukraine are pushing Kim Jong Un to become abang-adik of Vladimir Putin. From time-to-time Kim would fire a rocket or a missile to remind South Korea and the US of his gravitas, and this has created opportunities for countries like Australia and the Netherlands to send their ships or planes to fly around the area. And the area is right at the doorstep of China! Can China tolerate? Of course not!

 

China was so disdained of the Netherlands’ warship near its doorstep that it sent one of its oldest planes to intimidate it. (Some Taiwanese scholars said the plane should have discharged some human waste on the warship when flying over; others thought it should have dropped some leaflets with the image of Zheng Chenggong 郑成 onto the ship to remind the Dutch of their defeat at the hand of the former.)

 

Yes, China is not forging a formal alliance with Russia. But their relationship has thickened over the past couple of years. They are opening a huge common development and market zone in the Russia’s Far East and China’s northeast provinces. Remember Putin’s swing to Harbin to lay a wreath there during his May state visit to China? Japan You watch out; I have not done with you yet!

 

And Russian warships, including a nuclear-powered submarine, are sailing into Cuba’s main harbour! Moscow thinks it is time for them to flex their naval muscles in US’s own backyard. Let’s see how the US would react this time.

 

Across the Taiwan Strait

William Lai Ching-Te made his “presidential” inauguration speech on May 20. It is clear that he is determined to pursue a “Taiwan as a separate country” policy, regardless of what China has warned. China is in a dilemma. It is not difficult for China to overwhelm Taiwan militarily if it wants to. But the cost may be too high for it to bear – in terms of winning the hearts and minds of Taiwanese, since no matter how careful the operation is, deaths and destruction will invariably result.

 

On the other hand, if China does not act, the people in Taiwan, especially the young, will drift further and further in accepting China as the core motherland. Immediately after Lai’s inauguration, China staged an air-and-sea military exercise around Taiwan. Most Taiwanese have just shrugged it off as another show-show sign from China. But they may not realize the underlying dangers. China is adopting the “boiling-toad” strategy. One fine day, Taiwanese may wake up to find PLA soldiers right in front of their doorsteps.

 

Earlier in the month, top US admiral Samuel Paparo said the US military had a plan to turn the Taiwan Strait into an “unmanned hellscape” if China invaded. It is touted as their “Hellscape Strategy,” which will employ thousands of drones to make China’s military “miserable”. This will also buy the US time to respond. He is obviously angling for more money from the Congress!

 

Around the waters of the Huáng Yán Dǎo (黄岩岛. Scarborough Shoal)

Marcos Jr will certainly continue to poke China in the eyes. Sure, many of the islands that China is exerting sovereignty are geographically absurd to be theirs. But this is a cruel fact of history. Falklands, Diego Garcia, and many island in the mid-Pacific should not have been the British’s, the American’s, or the French’s. But they are. Before World War II, Filipinos were ruled by the Spaniards and later, the Americans. They had no territorial concepts beyond their main islands. The areas had historically been identified as China’s, you need to talk to the Chinese, not poke into their eyes!

 

But Marcos’s agenda is more personal than what is meant to be good for the Filipinos. His father’s ill-gotten billions are still sitting in America, so is his desire to rule the Philippines longer than what is now allowed. The Philippines will suffer greatly from tourism losses and its agriculture produce. And in the event of a hot war, the American bases are the natural targets of China’s missiles.

 

His father started his presidency with a noble mission. He soon turned the Philippines into a “Strong man” state and helped himself indiscriminately with the state’s coffer. And he became a fugitive. But his misdeeds were soon forgotten, thanks to Filipinos’ easy to arouse and easy to subdue nature. Is he going down his father’s path? Or does he care?

 

BRICS’s Archilles Heels

Started with Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (hence BRICS), the bloc has expanded to include Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran and the UAE as full members in January. Argentina decided not to accept membership after “rock-star” Javier Milei was elected president.

 

It started well, then it went through a period of uncertainty, when Jair Messias Bolsonaro became Brazil’s President in 2019. He was totally pro-Trump and was acting like a spanner in the fraternity. Brazil became a key player again after Luiz Lula da Silva returned as president in 2023.

 

It has often been touted as the future of the world, a slayer of the US hegemon, and a champion of de-dollarisation, Global South good causes championship, etc. But I always think there is an Achilles heel embedded in the fraternity in the name of Modi, India’s prime minister. Modi is a Hindu “saint”; he has only one agenda: take advantage of any situation that India can benefit from, regardless of its longer-term impacts or consequences. His vision and foresight are parochial in essence. He sees China with a pair of green lenses. And the West loves that and will do everything to encourage his G7 pretensions. The Economist magazine is a super-optimist about its future.

 

Some think that with the erosion of his support base in India’s latest general elections, Modi may mellow down somewhat. I think he will continue to adopt the anti-China policy since it is not a cause of the drop in his popularity. By and large, Indians do not take kindly to China’s advances.

 

It is likely that China, Russia, Brazil and Saudi Arabia will stay true to the spirits of the bloc. Countries like Iran is too ideologically entrenched. Egypt is largely a lame duck, and Ethiopia, UAE, and South Africa are too light-weight politically and economically.

 

And Now, Back to China’s Situation

I had always been a critic of China and many aspects of Chineseness, until Xi Jinping was installed as the leader of China in 2013. I even took offence when I was said to be a huá qiáo (华侨), which would imply that I was a sojourner but still called China home. Through the reading of Professor Wang Gungwu’s arguments, I came to use the term huáyì () to describe my heritage. Xi changed my perspectives about China and myself. I am, after all, a Zhōng-Guó ren (中国人) and should be proud of this fact. He is taking China to earn its rightful place in the world. The West knows China’s exceptionalism and is determined to retard it, even though China has said time and again it does not seek to replace any country as the hegemon of the world. I read widely and am seeing how the West is using its formidable media to spread lies and disinformation about China. The undiscerning lot are buying them hook, line and sinker. It is now my mission to help China tell its stories.

 

Chang'e 6 (嫦娥六号), Most Proud of You!

Doesn’t this say loud and clear that China is no inferior to any nation in the world technologically?

 

The mission began on May 3 when the probe was launched from Hainan Island. The materials collected from the far side of the moon is just the trophy. It is the flawless steps that have to be undertaken underscore the sophistication of the technology involved. 

 

The moon is tidally locked to the Earth, meaning it has equivalent orbital and rotational periods, causing the same side of the celestial body to constantly face our planet. Because of this, line-of-sight communication with spacecraft on the far side of the moon is impossible without utilizing additional relays. 

 

Now that Chang'e 6 has entered lunar orbit, it will coordinate with China's recently launched Queqiao 2 relay satellite to perform orbital correction manoeuvres ahead of releasing the combined lander and ascent stage from the orbiting probe for their landing attempt. Chang'e 6 is aiming for Apollo crater, inside the moon's South Pole-Aitken (SPA) basin, where researchers believe samples may contain clues about the moon's early history and evolution.

 

The samples were packaged in a canister-like container on top of the ascender, which then took off and rendezvoused and docked with the probe's orbiter-returner combination.

 

The samples were transferred from the ascender to the returner during this step. After orbiting the moon for around 14 days, the orbiter-returner combination will enter the moon-Earth transfer orbit. The combination will then operate in the orbit for about five days and will make one to three orbital adjustments during this period.

At a position around 5,000 km above Earth, the returner will separate from the orbiter and start the phase of re-entering the atmosphere and returning to Earth. The returner will touch down at a planned landing area at Siziwang Banner in north China's Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.

Chang'e 6 will collect a targeted 2 kilograms of lunar samples from the surface, as well as material drilled from up to 2 meters (6.5 feet) underground. Those samples will be stowed in the Chang'e 6 lander's ascent module, which will then launch and rendezvous with its probe counterpart in lunar orbit. 

 

The samples will then be relocated to a re-entry module on the Chang'e 6 orbiter, designed to protect the lunar material during re-entry through the Earth’s atmosphere, followed by a transfer burn of the probe's engine to set the spacecraft on an Earth-return trajectory.


Even the “photographer” behind the historic image of lander and the Chinese national flag on the surface of the moon’s far side is a marvel. It was done by a 5kg mini rover using software that allow it to move autonomously across the lunar surface to find the “best” angle for the picture!

 

And Huawei’s Pura 70
I am a great fan of Ren Zhengfei. I already possess a Huawei matepad and a GT4 watch, even though many of their functions are beyond me. My wife even wears her Huawei when she exercises and when she goes to bed! I had placed a booking for its Pura 70, but to my great disappointment, it is not able to download certain apps which I have to use in my work. It is not because it is incapable of; rather, it has been denied the access.

The harder the US sanctions Huawei, the more breakthroughs it will deliver. And the Americans are still scratching their heads where Huawei gets their chips!

 

起来! 起来! (Qǐ lai, Qǐ lai, Stand up! Stand up!)
One thing is certain though, no matter who gets elected, the US will continue to bash China. China will therefore step into a 2025 that is full of land mines and choked with poisonous gases.

There are three foreign science payloads in Chang’e 6 – a radon measuring instrument from France’s national space agency, a passive laser retroreflector from Italy’s National Institute for Nuclear Physics and a negative ion detection instrument from the Swedish Institute of Space Physics. It is said that the European Space Agency may put a stop to all future cooperation with China’s space agency. Why? Uncle Sam’s pressure, of course.

The Financial Times just reported that the British army is delaying King Charles cap badges. Why? A UK Defence official cites the possibility that tracking devices or GPS transmitters could be embedded into the metal crests of these badges. Paranoid? No, says a friend. It is simply a part of their demonizing campaign against China. Period.

At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the US military even launched a secret campaign to counter what it perceived as China’s growing influence in the Philippines. (Rodrigo Duterte was President then.) Through phony Internet accounts, it bad-mouthed Chinese face masks, test kits and Sinovac vaccines. You can see how low they are prepared to stoop! Now it is a piece of public knowledge. Do Filipinos realize that their protector is capable of compromising their lives if it suits them? Maybe I should paraphrase the recent remark of an American influencer (Scott Ritter?): We Americans don't love you! We just love your ingratiation and subserviency. 

How should China prepare itself to go into 2025?

My answer lies in the lyrics above, which is part of the Chinese national anthem!

And don’t waste time talking with the leaders from the West and pro-West countries. Just go ahead to do what is good for China and your friends in the Global South.

 

Friday, May 24, 2024

India's HSR Ambition

A matter of self-gratification?

The following poster appeared on my Facebook pages a couple of days ago. The picture is certainly authentic, but dated surely. (Shinzo Abe, Japan's former prime minister is long gone; his life was cut short by a gunman while making a campaign speech.) I would not have bothered to take a look if not for the "information" that it sought to tell readers. It was about India's upcoming bullet train routes and the distances they would cover. Next to the heading reads, in brackets, TOI. Is that Times of India?

Is this a piece to mock Modi? Or might it be a picture to remind Indians of the need to shape up?

I still remember Keretapi Tanah Melayu or the Malayan Railway. When I was doing my sixth form in Penang’s Technical Institute, we outstation students were given two-way transport money to spend term vacations at home. I would take the Penang Island-Perai ferry to catch KTM's night mail to Kuala Lumpur, and from there catch a taxi to go to Muar. (It was the same drill for my return to school journey.) KTM’s central station in Kuala Lumpur was (and still is) a historic landmark. It also had a big workshop in Sentul where many of the students from the Engineering Faculty of the University of Malaya were sent for their first- or third-year practical training. Unfortunately, you cannot see any train on either site now.

 

KTM dates back to the British colonial era. I knew there was a great deal of Indian footprints in KTM history but could not find much about this in Wikipedia. As I googled, I saw a relevant article written by a certain P Uthayakumar in January 2012 for Malaysiakini. Part of it reads:

 

“Hundreds of thousands of ethnic Indians were brought in with the railways in 1885 to then Malaya from India in building the Malayan railways. The first settlement of these Indian railway families was in Kg Railway, Sentul, Kuala Lumpur as the locomotives, coaches and railway tracks were assembled and later repaired and maintained from here.

 

“Even the ‘tablet' - the signal key secured in a ring passed and taken from one railway station to another – was written in Tamil and Malay.

“The first railway system was from Taiping to Port Weld (Teluk Sepetualang today).

“M Subramaniam (76) the oldest resident at this Sentul railway Village recounted how railwaymen would leave their wife and children behind in Kg Railway Sentul and the Sentul Railway Quarters and go on work stints in faraway Kelantan, Johor, Perlis etc for months, if not years.

“At Independence in 1957, some 80% of the Malayan railway staff were Indians.”

India was indeed once a railway superpower.

It had its first railway in 1837 - to ferry granite in Madras. Its first passenger train, however, ran only in 1853 - for 34 km between Bombay and Thane. Today, Indian Railways runs a route length of 68,426 km, of which 60,451 km is electrified. With more than 1.2 million employees, it is India’s second largest employer.

China's first experiences with railways were largely ludicrous. In 1865, a British merchant built a 600meter-long railroad outside the Xuanwu Gate in Beijing  to demonstrate the technology to the imperial court - only to be rejected. Again in 1876 a railroad was opened in Shanghai but only again to be dismantled, with the rails and rolling stock later shipped to Taiwan!

Qing's defeat in the First Sino-Japanese War stimulated railway development. The government began to recognize the importance of modernization on one hand, and on the other foreign powers were pressing hard for concessions to build railways to further their settlement and mineral rights. 

The rapid expansion of foreign railroad ownership and operation aroused strong public resentment and led to calls for domestic development of railways. To help local economies develop and retain earnings from railways, the Qing government in 1904 permitted provinces to organize their own railway companies and raise funds by selling shares to the public. From 1904 to 1907, 15 such companies were established. The Beijing-Zhangjiakou Railway was the first to be designed and built indigenously. Its chief engineer was Zhan Tianyou, who is known as the Father of China's Railways. The 189 km Shanghai-Hangzhou line was completed in 1909.

When some of these provincial railway ventures fell into bankruptcy in 1911, the foreign powers pressed the Qing government to permit them to take over the ventures. The Qing government tried to nationalize these locally controlled railway companies and have them pledged to foreign banks in exchange for loans. The move provoked fierce public opposition which contributed to the outbreak of the Xinhai Revolution that subsequently toppled the Qing dynasty.

At that time, there were only around 9,000 km of rails in China.

 

But today the country has more than 159,000 km of railways, of which more than 45,000 km are of  the high-speed rails (HSR) classification. 

 

As for India, not a single inch of HSR has been built since the above picture was taken.

 

How did the two countries’ railway system be so different – one keeps heading north, and the other, just keeps counting chickens before they are hatched?

 

Under Zhu Rongji’s premiership, China began the Shanghai maglev construction in March 2001. Commercial service commented on 1 January 2004. The top speed is 431km/h. The technology was German’s, but China made it happen! China’s first HSR (the Beijing-Tianjin intercity line) was introduced only in April 2007. There is no looking back since then. It has also won tenders to construct modern rail lines overseas, including Malaysia’s East Coast Rail Link.

 

The viability of such projects will always be questioned by politicians and economists – the former for not having the courage to do difficult things (financing and land acquisitions, etc) and the latter, for their conventional wisdom in project economics. China’s vision is cast years ahead, hence 45,000 km in less than two decades.

 

Modi wants India to be a part of the Global North. (He has no time for Global South – in needs like mending relationship with China and Pakistan, or in working with countries in Africa or South America or taking a visible stance in the Gaza genocide. He is only interested to rub shoulders with the Who’s Who in the western and pro-West world.) Indeed, people like Joe Biden and Rishi Sunak are encouraging him to think that way, so are The Economist et al in the media world (since India is sticking to the economic model they love). Yes, India has some of the best engineering brains in the world, but without the ethos of humility, grounded-ness in beliefs and ambitions, and a mission to embrace regardless of caste and religion differences, India can only continue to say this to the world each time China comes up with something: We can also do it, and we can do it better! 


I count many South Asians as good friends. Can’t I be truthful to them?


End


Postscript:

I usually leave my articles on my blog site for a few days before I alert friends of their existence. This allows me to make corrections or rephrase some of the things said in a more readable manner. On my revisit this time, I was pleasantly jolted by two comments, both from WALLA. I know WALLA is a friend, but I really do not know which. The two comments (and his previous) tell me that WALLA is a very knowledgeable and intellectual dragon. 

Sunday, May 19, 2024

The Proud Chinaman In Me

I often used the term Chinaman to mock myself in front of friends when I wanted to admit inadequacies in my social etiquette. It was meant to convey a sense of humility to my audience. Until one day…


My university mate Chin Mee Poon hates this term and in one meet-up bluntly suggested that I should not use it at all. I immediately came to realization that indeed it was a very derogatory term to fellow Chinese, and I must stop using it henceforth.

But out of politeness, I still do not feel good to tell friends off if they use the term, even if the context was not appropriate.

Over dinner recently, I was explaining to a fellow “wise man[1]” the frustration I faced over the fact that a junior colleague was unwilling to rise to the occasion although he was given an opportunity. The responsibilities he has to assume would mean that he has to be relocated from Hong Kong to Singapore or Jakarta. But he was too much of a family man and a loving father that he did not want to cause any disruption to the lives of his wife and teenage daughter. My group colleague was very dismissive about this junior colleague and blurted out, “I tell you, this XX is a Chinaman through and through.” I really do not know what he takes the term to mean. But I guessed it was an “holier than thou” sweep, which I thought was not an appropriate description of this junior colleague in the context we were talking about him. Out of courtesy, I decided to switch topic!

This “holier than thou” attitude amongst we Chinese has bothered me quite a bit. Just a couple of days ago, a relative from Melbourne was in town and he and his wife were putting up with us. My wife and I are very deeply indebted to them for their care of our daughter when she was studying in Melbourne. They are also very fond of our son. They have been living in Australia since the 1990s. Of course, they have seen the ugly side of many fellow Chinese, especially those from mainland China, in Melbourne and during their visits overseas. The term “Chinaman” would immediately spill from his mouth, totally devoid of affinity or kinship, each time he described China and Chineseness. I felt very uneasy, but what could I do, unless I was prepared to sour the relationship?

People like my colleague and my relative from Melbourne share a common trait shaped over years by Western and the pro-West media. Before the outbreak of COVID-19, these media were pretty objective and even though many, like The Economist, had a great deal of misgivings about China, I always took their opinions or pointers as lessons that China ought to learn in going forward. But after the pandemic, all hell broke loose and these media would not let go any opportunity to bash China, even though it was based on misinformation or built on disinformation. Thankfully, we now have sources other than these media to help disseminate truths. I am particularly impressed by some thinkers in Taiwan who spend session after session to analyse today’s geopolitics. There are about ten to twenty of them; many of them are already in their fifties or sixties and hold PhDs or advanced degrees from top universities or are retired generals or admirals in Taiwan’s armed forces, or former legislators or diplomats there. Most of them are outright contemptuous of Biden and his team. China should groom more people to speak the way these Taiwanese thinkers do. (I was again dismayed by the performance of a Chinese Defence Ministry’s spokesman who in the press conference they often hold talked about the situations in the Taiwan Straits and and the waters around the Scarborough Shoal (which the Chinese called Huáng Yán Dǎo [黄岩], where a dilapidated Filipino ship has been anchored for years.) He was so stiff, so scripted and harsh in tone, which invariably conveyed the image of a hardline Communist to viewers. He destroys rather than helps build empathy. (I read that Xi Jinping has just called for efforts to promote high-quality development of the tourism sector. He pointed out that the nation has become the world's largest domestic tourism market and the country with the largest number of outbound tourists, and a major destination for international tourists. Hope all these subtleties are also part and parcel of his team’s vision.)

 

I am a man who is full of prejudices and with a long string of likes and dislikes. The only thing is, I do not openly give any traces of them in front of those whom I think have a low degree of tolerance. For instance, I have developed a deep antipathy or even outright repugnance each time I hear Biden or Blinken speak. Ditto when I hear Oliva Siong or Liz Neo over CNA. (I particularly deplore Yellow Bananas; my wife often hears my annoyances each time I access SCMP. The Yellow Bananas there often couch their anti-China, pro-western, stances with fake concerns or “as if they know better” patronising attitudes over China’s policies or developments there.) My eyes would also automatically close if Gina Raimondo or Katherine Tai appeared on the screen. So, when friends forward contents about their speeches or policy pronouncements to me, my natural reaction is: We already know their agendas; why give space to people like them AGAIN?) I would never touch Nikkei even with a 10-ft pole. (They often bombard my mailbox with $1 subscription offers; unfortunately, it is virtually impossible for me to unsubscribe, even though I had not done so in the first place. Its persistence is so distasteful! But make no mistake about it, I am an ardent admirer of their social graces! But I just cannot stand Nikkei and the current breed of Japanese leaders for their total subserviency to Biden and his team.)

 

People like me are not nationals of China. We must be loyal to the country where we are citizens of, principally to its Constitution and its laws. But we have the right not to align yourself political with the government of the day. That is to say if you are a Chinese American, we do not have to kowtow to Biden. (However, if any of his policy is to become law, of course, you are duty bound to observe it.) Loyalty to the country where you call home does not mean that you cannot be proud of China. Let us be real, without a strong China, Chinese all over the world will always be looked upon with a degree of apprehension by the less-exposed local populace.

 

Xi has finally ushered China into a new threshold. His grandfatherly demeanours and statesmanship have changed many in Global South to view China as a country that they can count on to help to improve their lot. (Even several leaders in Europe are also buying this.) Hitherto, America’s sheriff-style leadership was a source of fairness and hope to many. It brought down tyrants and settled disputes, even though there were more to them than met the eye, given the knowledge we now have. America’s undisputed standing no longer holds any more. Some may still insist that Ukraine has been unfairly invaded, but I am sure history will put much blame on America for the destruction that Ukraine is suffering today. The war has also caused the world to distrust America in the wake of its weaponisation of the US Dollar, confiscation of Russian assets, and threatening and sanctioning of countries that trade with Russia. The straw that broke the camel’s back, I suppose, is its hypocrisy in the Gaza genocide. (Unfortunately, the Palestinians are also being deemed as an inconvenient lot in the Arab world, where it is generally everyone for himself there!)

 

The latest rounds of visit by US leaders – first by Raimondo, followed by Yellen and then Blinken – have convinced the Chinese leaders that they must not place any hope on America anymore. Biden would probably go down in history as the America president who truly lost China. Historically, Chinese harboured a great deal of fondness for America – for the help American rendered during and after World War II (General Claire Chennault’s Flying Tigers and General George Marshall’s attempt to reconcile Mao Zedong and Chiang Kai-Shek) and for Nixon’s visit which paved the way for China to return to the global stage, etc. On the other hand, Russians have always been viewed with suspicion – its annexation of many parts of China in the north, and for the abrupt withdrawal of much needed technical assistance by Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev in the aftermath of Mao’s refusal to play second fiddle in the Communist world. Biden has literally brought China and Russia to a realisation that they need each other to stay relevant and to do this, they have to usher in a new world order – a world order that cannot be totally dictated by America which no longer believes in free trade and thinks they must reign supreme come what may. (Remember in March 2021 Biden openly declared that under his watch he would not allow China to surpass the US? He had a huge opportunity to reset what was done wrong by Donald Trump; unfortunately, he succumbed to the wishes of the Deep State and became even more vicious. Remember Barack Obama's opinion of his deputy? Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fxxk things up!)

 

Putin visited Xi a couple of days ago. Many have missed this gesture of his: He laid flowers at a memorial to Soviet soldiers who died during the liberation of north-east China from the Japanese in the 1940s. He is sending a strong signal to Japan!

 

There are now three superpowers in the world – the US, China, and Russia. Watch out, Biden. China and Russia do not need to form an alliance; but their common cause is for all to see.

 

China has built a navy that is more than adequate to defend its eastern and southern waters. (It does not need one to go to the west coast of America; its intercontinental missiles, some of which are hypersonic, can certainly reach America in good time if it is attacked by the latter first.) Its nominal GDP will likely surpass the US by 2030. (In real terms, it has already overtaken the US.) Except for advanced lithography, China is virtually self-sufficient in every technological front. The US is not going to accept this fate and will continue to do everything possible to retard China regardless of who is the next president. But this trajectory is already unstoppable. And the world will enter into a more prosperous time again - if America is put in its proper place. 

 

What is important is for Yellow Bananas to stop thinking that they are not Chinese and want to help America retard China!



[1] I am affiliated with a group that enlists older ‘corporate’ figures like me to sit on their boards or exercise oversights over their business or charitable outfits. We jokingly term ourselves “wise men”.